As time goes on and I study deeper on the issue of the Zapruder film I find more and more evidence that the film was tampered with and more and more people who are standing up and saying this is not right. This Zapruder film is fake. It is not real.

The Disinfo and cointelpro agents have been in damage control mode for many years over this issue. But yuo can bury a truth for so long before it grows with the lie until it eventually grows strong enough to burst out from the ground and sweep all lies from it's path.

Sooner or later the world will stand up and say this Zapruder film has been tampered with it is fake. And then the questions will begin. The how, what, when, where's and whys of the matter.

The truth threatens the very institution that faked it. Who did fake it? The CIA, the FBI? and what measures have they gone to over the years to conceal and bury the truth. How many people have been destroyed and obliterated in the search of truth over the whole JFK Assassination.

Basically how much doo doo is the CIA and FBI in when it all comes tumbling out. And it is, tumbling out, there is a steadily growing faction of people screaming for the truth. More and more everyday. As people say the Zapruder Cartoon is the best film they have ever seen... For a fake

---

Quote -

Like the Kennedy assassination and its magic bullet, belief in the official story of 9/11 requires an heroic amount of self-denial. And like the Kennedy assassination, the operation was so complex that even honest researchers into the affair find themselves polarized, even when they have the best of intentions. For instance, researchers who spent years or decades studying the Zapruder Film for answers refuse to accept evidence that the film itself is a tampered, unreal document and unreliable source.

Now, just four years after 9/11, we have the spectacle of some people who hang on to the silly government Pentagon story taking to the airwaves and maillists denouncing researchers unwilling to discard basic physics as "COINTELPRO agents" and "Zionists." This kind of activity has the unfortunate effect of causing the attacked and more advanced researchers to become even more paranoid than necessary and more neurotic than previously, seeking out threats where there are none and picking fights with people that should be their allies. At least these sad sacks are more grounded in reality than those still holding on to ridiculous official paradigms.
http://www.total911.info/

---

If I was the people responsible and I am not and I am glad I am not because I personally hold human life dear and in high regard, then I would stop now before damage control is impossible to continue. These guys will destroy humainty at the rate they are going in the pursuit of hiding the truth. How long are the people going to stay complacent. How long ar ehte people going to allow the wanton lies and destruction to contrinue. How long before the people wake up and say this is not right, this has to stop. In the march for the NWO they have marched on in and taken over. Stop them now before it's too late and mankind is reduced to a slave society for the few rich controllers.

Recently I began to build a website regarding the JFK assassination and the Faking of the Zapruder film.

While investigating the film there were many inconsistenices that became apparent. These can be found at http://www.rejectz.com/  or the direct link of the JFK assassination website at http://www.rejectz.com/jfk.htm



In the photo above taken from a higher quality JPG's but there are a number of inconsistenices.

The picture here are supposed to represent two black men, one behind and one closer to the screen. They are both said to be clapping as the motorcade goes past as in the site banner above on the page.
 The picture is indicative of photo fakery and edits. Zapruder is fake.

 Point 1
 The rear black man, that we call One Leg Man has what suspiciously looks like a pasted on head. he has no rear neck at all. The pixilation of green carries through where his neck should be. He is a black man, he should have a black neck. His grey suit is rather shadowy and translucent when compared to other parts of the picture. He has another green pixelation patch on the sleeve where his inner elbow is.
 Point 2.
 Compare the detail on the so called front  "black man", who we call green man. Compare the detail at the back of his head to the black patch at the front that is supposed to represent his face. Look closely in this area, one could argue shadows but then shadows would go all the way down to his chest instead of ending, as the black patch does and then begins again.
 
 Point 3.
  Why does it look like there are pair of sunglasses in the middle of the picture down towards the bottom? Pay close attention to the middle section. Remember both these men are supposed to be clapping. We are supposed to be looking at the man behind's hands clapping. Is that what you see? How many people are in this picture and where exactly are they standing. Using Photoshop filters we are showing you here a few different perspectives of the same photo.
 Point 4
 The front man is supposed to be black, take a close look at his left hand, other than the shadows not matching pay close attention to the coloration on the wrist area and the dark patch at the fingers. One his right hand, well that whole area bears close scrutiny.
  Remember here, if the photos are edited, they are edited to hide something, to change something. Because it is edited or edited out we can't see what was originally there, what was, we can only see the traces or remnants of the editing. We can only see the lie because what we are seeing is not the truth.
  We can not, by looking at this picture tell what really was happening but what we can do is show you that possibly what you are supposed to be seeing, is not what you are seeing.
 
 


There is much more about this to be found on the website in question. http://www.rejectz.com/jfk2.htm

http://www.rejectz.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=2313

 Since Jim and I began our JFK site lately we both have been surprised at the response we have recieved.

We fully expected to raise debate on the issue but were rather surprised at the Vehemance of Opposition to our work from some quarters. We were insulted, told we should receive the death penalty, ridiculed and more. Suffice to say we found the bahaviour very strange.

Other people applauded our work and some of the authors of JFK book and websites said we were on to something. We had already figured that, then a contact of authority in the JFK research community explained to us about the Government Disinformation Programs that are working in the JFK community.

We read the links that we were pointed to and then felt like ripe fools for being fooled for so long. Suddenly it all made sense. The tactics described were the exact tactics used against us and other people who have asked the "tricky questions' over the years.


Disinfo Tactics
It is the disinfo artist and those who may pull their strings (those who stand to suffer should the crime be solved) MUST seek to prevent rational and complete examination of any chain of evidence which would hang them. Since fact and truth seldom fall on their own, they must be overcome with lies and deceit. Those who are professional in the art of lies and deceit, such as the intelligence community and the professional criminal (often the same people or at least working together), tend to apply fairly well defined and observable tools in this process. However, the public at large is not well armed against such weapons, and is often easily led astray by these time-proven tactics. Remarkably, not even media and law enforcement have NOT BEEN TRAINED to deal with these issues. For the most part, only the players themselves understand the rules of the game

 http://www.rejectz.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=2313
5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary 'attack the messenger' ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as 'kooks', 'right-wing', 'liberal', 'left-wing', 'terrorists', 'conspiracy buffs', 'radicals', 'militia', 'racists', 'religious fanatics', 'sexual deviates', and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.


Over the years there have been many mysterious deaths surrounding the JFK case along with many red herrings planted and much editing of film and photos evidence. So we understood the conspiracy was as such that it could only come from the top.

Once we understood this we looked at our postings and responses with new eyes and were amazed at how obvious it was. One thng that can be said after all this is a new phrase I have coined

The truth can always see a lie but a lie can't aways see the truth.

Mayet